Rules with reasons
Moderation
How review, recommendation restrictions, enforcement and appeals fit together.
What stays up and what travels further
Nabtap separates the rules for remaining on the service from the higher standard for broad recommendation. Some lawful or permitted content may remain available to followers or through direct navigation while being limited in discovery.
How decisions are made
Signals can come from user reports, automated detection, trusted experts and legal notices. Review considers content, context, severity, account history and likelihood of harm. Automation helps with scale; people review nuanced and appealed cases where appropriate.
Proportionate outcomes
- Education or warning.
- Interposition or age restriction.
- Recommendation limits.
- Content removal or feature restriction.
- Temporary suspension or permanent ban for severe or repeated abuse.
Accountability
Eligible decisions include reasons and appeals. We preserve enforcement history, track reversals and aim to report aggregate results so our system can be scrutinized and improved.
